Buying your dog a birthday gift? Keep the dog’s interests in mind

31xrko8uzil-_sx425_
iFetch Interactive Ball Launchers for Dogs [Courtesy: Amazon]
When it comes to household animals, dogs continue to be the preferred choice of pets globally. And wherever there is a home with a canine, the dog is usually considered a member of the family. So it does not come as a surprise when more than a third of dog-owning Americans admitted to buying birthday gifts for their dogs (with the occasional celebrity building a two-storey mansion for her dogs). With the global pet products and services industry surpassing the $100 billion mark for the first time in 2016, electronic toys and gadgets are being considered as must-haves for the “tech-savvy” dog (?!)

Consider the following gizmos: TailTalk is touted “the world’s dog emotion sensor” by capturing tail movement and translating it to the emotions that our dogs want to convey. FitBark monitors activity levels of your dog and calculates calories burned. Whistle is intended as a “smart” way to keep track of your pet’s location.

But did our dogs ask for these “gifts” in the first place? Do they even understand these technologies? More importantly, what do these gadgets mean for the autonomy of the animal? By subjecting our pets to technologies that we use daily, are we prioritizing the comfort and entertainment of the owner over the welfare of the animal? Continue reading “Buying your dog a birthday gift? Keep the dog’s interests in mind”

Advertisements

How the pregnancy test traveled from the laboratory into the hands of ordinary women

1389632692453260581
Early e.p.t advertisement [Courtesy: Jezebel.com]

Whatever individual women (and men) may feel about having children, the home pregnancy test (HPT) has become one of the most common diagnostic tools available over the counter today. In recent times, Indian pharmaceutical companies have marketed the product both to the “traditional house-wife” as well as to the “Generation Z’ers” using glamorous Bollywood stars.

The now ubiquitous home pregnancy test was very different back when it was first launched in the United States during the late 1970s. It came at a time when women were collectively organizing themselves across the world. Medical professionals and government regulators alike felt unequipped and threatened by the emergence of this new technology. Joan H Robinson analyzes the historical phenomenon of the home pregnancy test (HPT) in a well researched and extremely readable article in the October 2016 issue of Social Studies of Science. Using scholarship in science, technology and society studies (STS), Robinson narrates how various institutions navigated a tortuous legal and technological maze in society, to result in the now uncontested product. Continue reading “How the pregnancy test traveled from the laboratory into the hands of ordinary women”